Working with the contract

You should publish an award notice for any contract which is entered into as a result of a contract award procedure (open; restricted; competitive with negotiation; competitive dialogue; innovation partnership) for which a contract notice was published. In addition, an award notice should be published for the award of Light Touch Regime contracts that are over the relevant threshold.

Where the contract was advertised initially on OJEU prior to 11 pm on  31 December 2020, the Contract Award Notice should also be published in the OJEU, ideally with a copy to the Find A Tender service.

Where the contract was advertised initially on the Find A Tender service after 11 pm on  31 December 2020, the Contract Award Notice should also be published on Find A Tender. There is no need to copy to the OJEU. 

If the value of the contract is over £12,000 (central government) or £30,000 (sub-central government and NHS Trusts/NHS FTs) then you must publish contract award information on Contracts Finder, in accordance with Regulations 108 (for over threshold) and 110 (for under threshold). Note that this requirement does not apply to the procurement of clinical health services, nor if the contracting authority is an Academy or a maintained school. It will also not apply if the contract is very low in value (under £12k for central government or under £30k for non-central government and NHS Trusts/NHS FTs).

Yes, (unless (1) its value is under £12k for central government or under £30k for non-central government and NHS Trusts/NHS FTs, or (2) you are a maintained school or an Academy).

There is no need to publish an award notice for a call off contract, but you will need to publish information on Contracts Finder about the award of a call-off contract (unless (1) its value is under £12k for central government or under £30k for non-central government and NHS Trusts/NHS FTs, or (2) you are a maintained school or an Academy).

In general, no. If the original contract was subject to a contract award procedure under , the renewal should also be subject to a contract award procedure. Just because a certain supplier won the contract last time, does not mean they will succeed again. However, if the contract as originally awarded provides for a possible extension of the contract term (and this provision is consistent with the original procurement documents) this would allow for the contract to continue to run during such an extension without a further procurement. See below.

It depends on whether this is a "substantial modification" or not. Substantial modifications (as defined in the 2015 Regulations) are not permitted without running a new procurement process. See below.

It depends on whether this is a "substantial modification" or not. Substantial modifications (as defined in the 2015 Regulations) are not permitted without running a new procurement process. See below. Note that there are specific provisions about the maximum term of framework agreements (which in general should not exceed four years).

It depends on whether this is a "substantial modification" or not. Substantial modifications (as defined in the 2015 Regulations) are not permitted without running a new procurement process. See below.

Regulation 72 says that you may not make a "substantial modification" without running a new procurement process. It then lists out several types of modification which are permitted, as follows. Anything outside of these "safe harbours" is likely to be a substantial modification requiring a new procurement. 

Permitted modifications: 

• Where the change is set out clearly, precisely and unequivocally in the original contract and does not change its overall nature;
• Where the change was not set out in the original contract,
  • but nonetheless it is not “substantial” (as defined at Regulation 72(8)); or
  • the (cumulative) change in value is under 10% (services & supplies) or under 15% (works) and is also under threshold; or
  • the change is needed due to unforeseen circumstances and it doesn’t change overall nature of contract and price increase is < 50% (NB a “contract modification notice” must be published);
  • additional works, services or supplies are necessary and a change in contractor: can’t be made for economic or technical reasons e.g. interoperability with existing kit, AND would cause significant inconvenience or duplication of costs (NB a “contract modification notice” must be published);
  • the change is the replacement of contractor following corporate restructuring, insolvency, merger etc. and new contractor still meets selection criteria and there is no other substantial modification.

Regulation 73 introduced new rights for a contracting authority to terminate a contract if there has been an "illegal" substantial modification to the contract or if it turns out that the contractor should not have been awarded the contract as it should have been excluded under the exclusion criteria. It is not strictly necessary to amend standard termination clauses to include this right, as the effect of Regulation 73 is to imply them into any contract which is silent on the subject. However our recommendation is that it is best to expressly address these termination events and provide legal certainty by detailing, for example, the consequences of a termination on one of those grounds.

Yes. Regulation 84 requires you to draw up a report contain the information it specifies at Regulation 84(1). Have a look at out Regulation 84 Report Checklist for details of content requirements. In addition Regulation 84(7) to (9) states you must document the progress of all procurement procedures, keeping sufficient documentation to justify decisions taken in all stages of the procurement, including communications with bidders, drafting of the procurement documentation, negotiations with bidders, selection and award of the contract. This documentation must be kept for at least 3 years from the date the contract is awarded.