Looking to challenge a procurement decision?

Suppliers wishing to challenge have only a short time frame in which to act. Click here for our useful guide.

Which Regulations do you need?

To get up to speed with the various new procurement law regulations, please click below;

> Concession Contracts Regulations 2016 

> Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016

> Public Contracts Regulations 2015 

If you're not sure which regulations apply, click here.

(Click to edit)

Using framework agreements

Using framework agreements

November 17, 2010 4:13 PM | Posted by Beresford-Jones, Jenny | Print this page
The ERG (OGC) has recently published a policy note on framework agreements, reminding contracting authorities of the importance of checking that they fall within the class of public bodies who are entitled to use that framework.

This issue has been made more important since the Remedies Directive came into force at the end of the 2009, bringing with it a new remedy of “ineffectiveness” for contracts entered into directly without competition, when competition was required. If a declaration of ineffectiveness is made, the contract comes to an end prospectively from the date of the declaration.

The ERG (OGC) points out that a contracting authority who uses a framework without being entitled to do so is, in effect, awarding a contract directly and without the proper element of competition and thus is laying itself open to a claim by a challenger for a declaration of ineffectiveness.

Contracting authorities must therefore check the scope of any proposed framework arrangement very carefully. The policy note states that specifying "any contracting authority" as being entitled to use a framework in the OJEU notice is unacceptably wide. It is acceptable for the framework to mention "classes" of public bodies, provided this class description is sufficient to immediately identify whether a public body is a member of that class. If this is not possible, the members of the class must be fully listed out.

Frameworks are only open to the contracting authorities that were originally party to the agreement. However, the policy note contemplates that changes to the list of members of the "class" may be legal, provided that the scale and scope of the framework is not materially altered.

The policy note suggests that operators of current frameworks where terminology is too generic should consider issuing clarifications containing more detailed descriptions of which bodies are entitled to use the framework. Obviously, in issuing these clarifications, it is important to take a conservative approach and not to extend the original scope of the framework, whether in terms of value or classes of public bodies permitted to use it.

Contact Us

The Procurement Portal aims to provide a "one stop shop" for procurement law queries and advice.

Click here to email our team with your query.

Managing and mitigating procurement risk course

This updated course is great for anyone who wants to make informed judgments around procurement risk and be able to handle potentially contentious issues with confidence.

You can access our updated course here.

Subscribe by email

> Subscribe to our blog updates by email

The "FeedBurner" subscription service is provided by a third party and Mills & Reeve LLP therefore accepts no responsibility or liability for this service. Please also refer to our full terms and conditions.

Procurement FAQs

We have over 100 questions and answers on a host of topics, from advertisement to managing a procurement challenge.

> Click here to find out more